once again, check that github discussion <https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/139> and see what you make of it...
2017-07-30 15:33 GMT-03:00 Christof Ressi <christof.re...@gmx.at>: > > on a view against a consensus we seem to have here, in which a standard > search path is not a place for externals, > > but that's rather absurd. what is the use of a standard path if not a > place where to put libraries? you described it beautifully in your HOWTO: > > application specific standard path = only for this Pd installation > user specific standard path = only for Pd installations of this user > global standard path = for all Pd installations > > who actually disagrees with this? > > --- > > user defined search paths are a nice feature but they have a serious > disadvantage: you can't interface them with [declare], so it's not the best > thing to use with libraries. I think this is important to remember! > maybe this could be resolved by adding another flag to [declare] for user > defined paths, like [declare -user myfolder]. this would be a very cool > feature anyway! > > --- > > I think for experienced users the situation is fine. I'm really happy with > Deken on Windows right now. The problem is rather that the standard search > paths are awkward for beginners on Windows and OSX. They are either hidden > or users don't have writing permission. > > personally I really think that the user specific standard path should be > autocreated (by the installer and/or Deken) - like any other program does. > when I install REAPER on Windows I automatically get a folder > C:\Users\Christof\AppData\Roaming\REAPER > > but I also like Alex' idea that Deken should always initially propose the > user specific standard path and create it when you want to install there! > > sorry for being redundand but I think we have to find a consensus on this > sooner or later, not necessarily for this release! > > Christof > > > > > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 30. Juli 2017 um 19:27 Uhr > Von: "Alexandre Torres Porres" <por...@gmail.com> > An: "Christof Ressi" <christof.re...@gmx.at> > Cc: "Jesse Mejia" <jme...@anestheticaudio.com>, pd-list <pd-l...@iem.at> > Betreff: Re: [PD] New users and external path struggles > > > > 2017-07-30 14:06 GMT-03:00 Christof Ressi <christof.re...@gmx.at[mailto: > christof.re...@gmx.at]>: > So are there arguments against documents/pd as a standard search path? > Let's stay clear from the autocreation topic for now. > > The arguments seem to be based on a view against a consensus we seem to > have here, in which a standard search path is not a place for externals, > and that it'd be the same as a "user added path". You can check the github > discussion and see what you make of it. > > Anyway, I tried pointing it out in my first response to this thread, when > I said: "you mention issues related to Pd's current "Standard Paths", given > that it is clear to you that this is the best practice for externals. > Surprisingly, that is not a consensus between developers. (...) "User added > search paths" are not the same as a "standard path", I agree (...) That's > also something I suspect is causing many confusion, which would be a notion > that a "user added search path" would be exactly the same as a "standard > path", but it isn't. >
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list