On 01.03.21 04:13, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
Em dom., 28 de fev. de 2021 às 16:20, Alexandre Torres Porres
<por...@gmail.com <mailto:por...@gmail.com>> escreveu:
I'm thinking about creating a variant of delread/write~ for ELSE
with this "freeze" functionality. But maybe we can request to add it
to vanilla.
maybe this is best for the pd-dev list, but here I go.
In my design choice for a variation of delread/write, I think it could
be given a unique delay name when a delay write object is not given a
delay line argument. This name could then be sent via an outlet to a
read object. This looks like how things work for MAX's tapin~/tapout~
and I confess I'm taking it as a model.
Now, big question, can I force an order of execution with such a
connection? Would it have to be a signal connection only?
I think adding that freeze option to delay would be fantastic and even
more so when it gets Pd's functionality en par with the Max/MSP
counterparts.
What I also would like to see is a tabwrite~-like object that uses an
array to write to, but each new sample gets pushed to the next index of
the array when a new one is added.
m.
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
