> On Tuesday, March 2, 2021, 2:11:36 PM EST, Alexandre Torres Porres > <por...@gmail.com> wrote: > The idea doesn't sound bad, it'd be a nice GUI feature. As for the design, I > think you'd need a special flag to set the name and not just some symbol, > this way you'd not get into conflicts with the actual arguments. I have no plans to implement it that way, and the tooltip implementation we wrote in Pd-l2ork 1.0 draws directly from the help patches for its tooltip data. However, if it turns out that a sizable number of users are abusing inlet(~)/outlet(~) args that way and they really want it displayed in the tooltip, I'll revisit it. -Jonathan
> Well, anyway, someone started abusing the fact that the object doesn't > complain about invalid arguments and now I can only see this as a bad > practice indeed. I like to joke that Pd will not complain if you create [osc~ > 440 hz (cycles per second)], but that doesn't mean you should do it :)
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
