Email crossing, I literally apologised for my dumbness and noticed that single difference - we’re on the same page here :)
> On 28 Jan 2022, at 19:29, oliver <oli...@klingt.org> wrote: > > Miller Puckette via Pd-list wrote: >> Hi PA - >> Are you doing stuff that "soundfiler" doesn't? If so, it would be better >> to add to the soundfiler object than to add a new object with its own name. > > The one thing that [soundfiler] can not do, is to report the length of a > soundfile WITHOUT fully loading it into an array. > > That would be a great feature to have for [soundfiler]'s right outlet, > especially in the case of big files. > > You can get all the other information (channels, samplerate etc.) by loading > just a small sniplet of the source file (even 1 sample is sufficient IIRC) > into a buffer, but not the length. you would need to add "-resize" to the > load flags, which is not useful for (very) long files > > i still use IEMLIB's [soundfile_info] for that purpose. > > > > best > > oliver > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
