Wait - this is embarrassing, it seems that the left outlet still spits out the number of samples when there are no destination arrays so I should be golden…
I probably need a weekend. Sorry for the Friday night noise. > On 28 Jan 2022, at 19:35, Miller Puckette <m...@ucsd.edu> wrote: > > Yep, I can think of other reasons you'd want to know the size of a soundfile > in a Pd patch without having to read the whole thing in. > > cheers > M > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 07:32:02PM +0000, Pierre Alexandre Tremblay wrote: >>> I forgot is even simpler (no need for an array) >> >> Oh la la this is embarrassing. I didn’t know one could not supply an array… >> but that way I don’t get the size of the file in frames. >> >>> Are you doing stuff that "soundfiler" doesn't? If so, it would be better >>> to add to the soundfiler object than to add a new object with its own name. >> >> >> Indeed Miller I’ll do a PR to add it at the end then. I get everything else >> with soundfiler >> >> For info, I need the size of the sum of my sound files in frames and in >> channels to allocate the right size once. I do that in Max and SC doing 2 >> passes, once to read the headers and accumulate what I need in both >> dimensions (and capture the SR at the same time) then I assign then I read >> and copy. For large corpora, this is useful. >> >> So the proposal is not so big and bold as my first email… but still a needed >> feature. > > > >> _______________________________________________ >> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
