Looks like we could “Ask Apple”… https://developer.apple.com/events/ask-apple/
I would like to know how an open source project which relies on freely-shared plugins is supposed to exist on a platform that is making it harder on accessibility. I have had a developer account for many years but that doesn’t mean I like jumping through these hoops after spending too long figuring them out. It would be nicer if you, as a user, could simply tell the system: “Pd can load whatever dynamic libs.” It’s the same situation for other environments such as Max. enohp ym morf tnes ----------- Dan Wilcox danomatika.com robotcowboy.com > On Oct 11, 2022, at 8:01 PM, Dan Wilcox <danomat...@gmail.com> wrote: > > You already have you answer: no code signing or notarization means users get > the security popup when the dylibs are loaded but they just have to select > open as far as I know. Gatekeeper asks them once, then the system remembers > the selection. I believe it may also require changing a privacy setting in > System Preferences to allow it. > > I already added the "Disable library validation" entitlement back for the > first Pd release for 10.15 which introduced the stronger security settings. > > Also, I think calling them "thieves" is misleading. If you don't want to use > the platform or the services which are provided with the developer account, > don't. No one is forcing you. Please don't contribute to FUD. > > You could simply provide the code and perhaps the make files to automate the > process, then convince an institution to pay for the developer account > license. I included this as one of my expenses for my last funded iOS > project... :) > >> On Oct 11, 2022, at 7:12 PM, Lucas Cordiviola <lucard...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> @ Dan >> >> Thanks for sharing this. I'll be digging about ` you need an Apple >> Developer account (and Apple ID to sign up for one)`. If there's no >> workaround about the us$100 i'll be giving up notarizing builds. Do you know >> of a way to not send money to the thieves (if i'm not mistaken) ? >> >> or to put it in another way: >> >> if I don't codesign/notarize the builds: is just that users have an "open >> anyway" dialog? or is it a total "show stopper" that quits Pd? >> >> Which way should I go without the $100 ? > > -------- > Dan Wilcox > @danomatika > danomatika.com > robotcowboy.com > > >
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
