What worries me most, with FluCoMa in head, is what is the horizon to support this - in other words, when is 32 and 64 will be shipped as equal.
There is no more dev resources apart from some free time by yours truly for all the stuff so I need to plan carefully… in years! So if anyone on the dev team knows the horizon what would be appreciated > On 6 Dec 2023, at 08:27, Alexandros Drymonitis <adr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Sorry for the second question, now read the pd-lib-builder README. It states > that 64-bit externals will indeed get a different name. > > On 12/6/23 10:21, Lucas Cordiviola wrote: >> there is a name convention to support both float types in the same path. >> >> https://msp.ucsd.edu/Pd_documentation/x4.htm#s1.2.1 >> >> If you are using lib-pd-builder see: >> >> https://github.com/pure-data/pd-lib-builder/blob/master/tips-tricks.md#building-double-precision-externals >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas. >> >> On 06/12/2023 05:12, Roman Haefeli wrote: >>> On Wed, 2023-12-06 at 09:43 +0200, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: >>>> The question now is how to have both versions run happily side by >>>> side? >>>> On the 64-bit version I did find zexy (but some other libraries I >>>> searched for, including my own, neuralnet, were not available - not a >>>> surprise for my own, I haven't compiled it for the 64-bit version), >>>> but >>>> installing it through deken, breaks compatibility with the 32-bit >>>> version (I guess it overrides it). >>> You could configure different install and search paths for single- and >>> double-precision versions of Pd. I don't know if they share the config >>> file. If they do, you would have to adjust the config whenever you >>> switch between them. >>> >>>> So when I open the 32-bit version, >>>> zexy is no longer available. If I install it through deken from the >>>> 32-bit Pd, then it's not available for the 64-bit Pd. >>>> >>>> Another question is, how to compile externals for 64-bit Pd? I would >>>> like to offer [neuralnet] for this version too. >>> Just compile it against the m_pd.h of the double-precision edition of >>> Pd. That's not a very qualified statement, though. I haven't tried it >>> myself yet. And from what I read about the topic, not all sources are >>> compatible with Pd64 right away. >>> >>> Roman >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
