Hi, ...
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 04:46:14PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> Federico Montesino Pouzols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
>
> > On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 02:20:18PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've got the current CVS version running at
> > > https://atlobk01.cern.ch/pdbv/
> > >
> > > As you may see, for some packages, the /pdbv/package/$package.html
> > > file hasn't been generated.
> > > Did you also noticed something like this?
> >
> > Yes, there must be something broken in pdbv-1.2.1. At first sight,
> > from the pointer you give, it seems that the info for the first 10
> > packages is not generated. On my box, which has 1036 packages
> > installed, the info for the first 3 packages is not generated too.
>
> And you didn't noticed this for the 1.2.0 ?
No, 1.2.0 works fine. However, it may also contain the bug. I
mean that this may be a very subtle bug, since 1.2.1 fails to generate
the info for the first 3 packages on my box, while it fails to
generate the first 10 packages for your box. So it may be a bug that
appears in very particular conditions.
>
> >
> > Also, when I try pdbv-1.2.1 on my box, it gives a lot of
> > errors like this when generating XHTML output:
> >
> > sed: -e expression #1, char 10: Unknown option to 's'
> >
> > However, there are no error messages when generating HTML
> > output.
>
> Ok, this was a stupid syntax mistake. Fixed.
> Normally unrelated.
>
> > Does the rpm version work well? dpkg.sh has not changed
> > lately, so it may be a bug in dpkg.sh that had not appeared until
> > now, or a bug in the scripts that use dpkg.sh.
>
> I need to do more test.
>
>
> --
> Mathieu Roy
>
> << Profile << http://savannah.gnu.org/users/yeupou <<
> >> Homepage >> http://yeupou.coleumes.org >>
> << GPG Key << http://gpg.coleumes.org <<
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pdbv-dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/pdbv-dev
