On [Thu, 01.04.2010 22:35], Jose E. Marchesi wrote: > 2) jbig2enc is a C++ library, so what way do you recommend to go > here? I think the way in which it is currently provided (a static > library of C++ objects) is definitely not the right one for our > purposes. Would it be ok to use it as a shared library with a C > interface? > > A shared library would be quite convenient. Is the library providing > a proper C interface that we can use?
As far as I have seen the high-level API can easily be put 'extern "C"'. I will examine this further and propose a patch to the jbig2enc maintainer/creator for building the library as a shared one. Johannes -- Johannes Tax [email protected]
