> 2) jbig2enc is a C++ library, so what way do you recommend to go
> here? I think the way in which it is currently provided (a static
> library of C++ objects) is definitely not the right one for our
> purposes. Would it be ok to use it as a shared library with a C
> interface?
>
> A shared library would be quite convenient. Is the library providing
> a proper C interface that we can use?
As far as I have seen the high-level API can easily be put 'extern "C"'.
I will examine this further and propose a patch to the jbig2enc
maintainer/creator for building the library as a shared one.
Ok. Thanks.
--
Jose E. Marchesi <[email protected]>
http://www.jemarch.net
GNU Project http://www.gnu.org
