The PDF list is a service provided by PDFzone.com | http://www.pdfzone.com __________________________________________________________________
All, We are considering using 128 bit encrypted PDF to secure digital images and other key electronic records. Our lawyers insist on using optical Write Once Read Many (WORM) drives to preserve the “legal admissibility” of these records via the unalterable nature of optical WORMs. I don’t want optical WORMs (expensive, slow, obsolete) but cannot convince the lawyers that PDF security is plenty to ensure the document was not altered in a court of law. Any advice to get these lawyers off my back would be greatly appreciated. Is there any legal precedent for the admissibility of secured PDF? Thanks in advance, Atul To change your subscription: http://www.pdfzone.com/discussions/lists-pdf.html
