The PDF list is a service provided by PDFzone.com | http://www.pdfzone.com __________________________________________________________________
My father uses digitally signed PDFs in state and federal courts all the time. Typically he will just burn a CD. Our corporate council here uses digitally signed PDFs on CD-R. On 11/6/03 7:00 AM, "Atul Sanghi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The PDF list is a service provided by PDFzone.com | http://www.pdfzone.com > __________________________________________________________________ > > All, > > We are considering using 128 bit encrypted PDF to secure digital images and > other key electronic records. Our lawyers insist on using optical Write Once > Read Many (WORM) drives to preserve the “legal admissibility” of these > records via the unalterable nature of optical WORMs. > > I don’t want optical WORMs (expensive, slow, obsolete) but cannot convince > the lawyers that PDF security is plenty to ensure the document was not altered > in a court of law. Any advice to get these lawyers off my back would be > greatly appreciated. Is there any legal precedent for the admissibility of > secured PDF? > > Thanks in advance, > Atul > > > > > To change your subscription: > http://www.pdfzone.com/discussions/lists-pdf.html > > Matt Beals Director of Manufacturing and Production Paizo Publishing, LLC (425) 289-1343 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.paizo.com To change your subscription: http://www.pdfzone.com/discussions/lists-pdf.html
