Respectfully, seeking to bend over backwards to try to work when stated prerequisites (not introduced by me) aren't present due to using a clearly underfunctional tool (seriously, do try cpanm - you won't ever want to go back) seems like a pointless task.
-----Original Message----- From: Derek Lamb Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 10:52 PM To: Ed Cc: pdl-devel Subject: Re: [Pdl-devel] CPAN clean install 2.008-rc1 fails,missing Module::Compile CPAN is one of the install paths we support, so I was giving it a try. Usually I don't have any issues. https://github.com/ingydotnet/module-compile-pm/issues/5 > On Apr 16, 2015, at 3:40 PM, Ed <ej...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > I highly recommend not using the CPAN module directly (or at all) to > install modules, but instead use the "cpanm" command > (https://metacpan.org/pod/App::cpanminus), which will fetch all prereqs, > and if any are unsuccessful, it stops there. > > What is the Module::Compile error? I see the CPAN latest is 0.35, which > has been out for some time (after I badgered Ingy to fix & release it) and > works for me on Linux and Windows. > > -----Original Message----- From: Derek Lamb > Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 10:18 PM > To: pdl-devel > Subject: Re: [Pdl-devel] CPAN clean install 2.008-rc1 fails,missing > Module::Compile > > As a follow-up, the problem was that Module::Compile did not pass its own > tests, so didn't install. The PDL build saw this, but proceeded anyway. > I've posted the issue to Module::Compile's Github issue tracker. > >> On Apr 15, 2015, at 3:05 PM, Derek Lamb <de...@boulder.swri.edu> wrote: >> >> I attempted a clean install of 2.008-rc1 on a OS X 10.10.1 VM, via CPAN. >> I completely cleaned ~/.cpan and started a new local::lib. >> >> 'make' works OK. 'make test' passes, but complained about unsatisfied >> "REQUIRED prerequisites" (are there any other kind?), specifically >> Module::Compile was missing. So even though 'make test' had 'Result: >> PASS', install did not proceed because 'make test' returned a bad status. >> >> I didn't think I would be able to get to 'make' with unsatisfied Runtime >> Requirements. >> >> Derek >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT >> Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard >> Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live >> exercises >> http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- >> event?utm_ >> source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF >> _______________________________________________ >> pdl-devel mailing list >> pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-devel >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT > Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard > Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live > exercises > http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- > event?utm_ > source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF > _______________________________________________ > pdl-devel mailing list > pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_ source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF _______________________________________________ pdl-devel mailing list pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-devel