Thank you Luis,
I think I have a different issue, though, I think.
I've got a piddle with c type complex double, pdl type cdouble. There's
no '<' or '>' for that c type, ops.pd takes care that no overloaded code
is generated, otherwise that fails.
Yet when I say
$a=ones(3)+ci;
$a=xvals(3)+ci;
print $a<$b;
I get as result the comparison of the real parts. I suspect some
'clever' PDL_ANYVAL logic is going on here, yet I don't get it.
Best
Ingo
PS: Check out the nat_complex branch https://github.com/fantasma13/pdl.git
On 25.04.19 20:38, Luis Mochan wrote:
I made a similar discovery and asked on the pdl-general list on
Jan. 18. The answer I got from Derek Lamb is that the issue has been
corrected on the complex_atan2 branch in github. I recall there have been
several other changes to PDL::Complex on that branch.
Regards,
Luis
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 08:01:01PM +0200, Ingo Schmid wrote:
Hi,
comparison of complex numbers make sense only to some extent, < , > are
not defined. Yet even though in ops.pd they are disabled, somehow the
real part gets compared. I guess there's a hidden conversion to double.
I just can's see where that's happening.
Does anyone know?
Best wishes
Ingo
_______________________________________________
pdl-devel mailing list
pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-devel
_______________________________________________
pdl-devel mailing list
pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-devel
