Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
> But then I could be wrong. Folks on this list tell me I am
> wrong about the 35/1.4A. Only if so, what was that I held in my
> hand once. It was used and they wanted a $1000 for it so I
> couldn't afford it. But I put it on a camera and looked through
> it, and lusted for it. Also why did a Pentax rep agree that
> they existed, but were very hard to find because they only made
> a few?
Hi Tom ...
You are wrong <g> ... but only on a small point. Pentax made a
35mm/1.4, but it was in an M version, not an A series. And
there were very few made as it was only made as a "prototype".
You can find it here:
http://www.phred.org/pentax/k/lenses/prototypes/index.html
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The difference between a good photograph
and a great photograph is subtleties."
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org.
