I don't see what's so hard about reading the letters. On my 17" monitor, I
CLEARLY can read that it's a 50/1.7 lens. No "if's ands or buts about it."
I think the seller forgot a comma also . . . and has the 50 confused with a
portrait lens . . . just my opinion on that one.
Illinois Bill
"David P. Chernicoff" wrote:
> At 08:10 AM 1/30/2001 -0600, Todd Stanley wrote:
>
> >Not my auction. Looks like the seller doesn't know what he has. Looks
> >like the camera has a SMC-A 50mm F1.2 mounted on it, and the BIN price is $175
> >
> >http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1211275592
>
> Thanks to a very high-resolution 21", and some decent graphics software,
> I'm 99.99% certain that the lens reads 1:1.7. The glass is identical (at
> 400% size) to my A 1.7 In the original picture size, it looks like the
> glass fill the entire area which would be covered by the filter ring. That
> is not the case. Also the crack on the side of the body is pretty bad.
>
> David<
>
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org.
