tom wrote: > True, it just seems Delta 100 is > more finicky in that regard. The few > negs I have have highlights that are > just tough to print. Maybe I can learn something from your problems. At what EI do you expose Delta 100, and under what lighting conditions? What developer have you used? Time/temp/agitation? -- Shel Belinkoff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'll shoot b&w until I die. There will always be film, paper, and chemicals somewhere, and I don't mean that sissy C41 s#!& either! - rec.photo.darkroom - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- OT: Ilford film choice Terence Mac Goff
- Re: OT: Ilford film choice Aaron Reynolds
- Re: Ilford film choice Terence Mac Goff
- Re: OT: Ilford film choice Mark Dalal
- Re: OT: Ilford film choice tom
- Re: OT: Ilford film choice Shel Belinkoff
- RE: OT: Ilford film choice Jens Bladt
- Re: OT: Ilford film choice Aaron Reynolds
- Re: OT: Ilford film choice tom
- Re: OT: Ilford film choice Shel Belinkoff
- Re: OT: Ilford film choice tom
- RE: OT: Ilford film choice Jens Bladt
- Re: OT: Ilford film choice Shel Belinkoff
- RE: OT: Ilford film choice Jens Bladt
- RE: OT: Ilford film choice Jens Bladt
- RE: OT: Ilford film choice Ken Archer
- Re: OT: Ilford film choice Shel Belinkoff
- Re: OT: Ilford film choice Aaron Reynolds
- Re: OT: Ilford film choice Mike Johnston
- Re: OT: Ilford film choice Mike Johnston