Pal wrote:
>Theres no reason why fps should go down while the data imprinting is
engaged. In contradiction to other dataimprinting systems, Pentax' data >is
printed while the film is winded and the exposure time the data is imprinted
with is certainly so fast that the fps rate won't interfer..
Assume that my camera has a half-exposed roll and camera will be having
exposure information about already exposed
films.
At this time, If I remove the battery to replace with new one, will I loose
all the exposure data?
Bye
Ramesh
-----Original Message-----
From: Pål Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 2:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MZ-S Motor drive speculation
Len wrote:
> Yes, Ken, you are correct. Other cameras I have owned require turning off
> imprinting in order to get the highest fps rate.
Theres no reason why fps should go down while the data imprinting is
engaged. In contradiction to other dataimprinting systems, Pentax' data is
printed while the film is winded and the exposure time the data is imprinted
with is certainly so fast that the fps rate won't interfer with the process.
It doesn't wait with winding until the data is printed as those systems that
print between the frames does.
Pål
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
