No Mark, A Z-5, not a ZX-5. A Z-5 is probably more similar to a PZ style
camera than a ZX. That's why I'm asking people what they think.
But thanks anyway....
Dosk
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 12:01 AM
Subject: RE: Z-5 VS. ZX-5n....
> I have a ZX-5 and I really like it a lot. It is missing two useful
features
> as compared to the ZX-5n: Auto-bracketing and depth-of-field preview. It
> is pretty easy to manually bracket exposures. If you ever intend to use a
> gradient filter for landscape work, depth-of-field preview is a must-have,
> and I really miss it a lot. I'd buy a ZX-5n over a ZX-5 specifically for
> the DOF preview.
>
> --Mark
>
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
