Hi
I don't totally disagree :-). The PZ1/PZ1-p are by fare my most used
cameras. I just like tho think the MZ-S is even better in this respect.
Jens
-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]På; vegne af John Francis
Sendt: 20. februar 2001 22:52
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Ergonomics
Jens Bladt wrote:
>
> Imagine setting the camera (a PZ-1p) to:
> HYP program
> Highspeed AE.
> Continuos filmadvance
> Manal Focus
> Centerweight/spot meetering
> 1½ stop + correction
> The "subject" will be long gone before your'e ready to even start
> shooting!!!
> I think this is one of the reasons why many of us still use "old" cameras.
It's a lot faster to set my PZ-1p that way than it is to set up my MX
or
Super Program to do the same thing . . .
And it's a heck of a lot faster for me to grab my PZ-1p and get a shot
of something unexpected than it is for me to do it with my MX; by the
time I've adjusted the focus and the exposure, the "subject" is long gone.
I think this is one of the reasons why many of us use "new" cameras :-)
--
John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Silicon Graphics, Inc.
(650)933-8295 2011 N. Shoreline Blvd. MS 43U-991
(650)932-0828 (Fax) Mountain View, CA 94043-1389
Hello. My name is Darth Vader. I am your father. Prepare to die.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
