Rick,
I can't agree more, and have been telling everyone
I know not to buy digital yet unless they want to spend a lot of money on a
Pro camera. And even then look out.A Pro friend of mine bought one, an
expensive Nikon. He now regrets having sold his darkroom equipment.
He has to send any MF work out to a lab. He has a Nikon neg scanner and
colour printer but is limited in paper size. The Nikon camera had a bug in it's
firmware, which Nikon Canada was a) unaware of. b) denied the problem
existed c) could not have cared less about it. They did eventually
contacted Japan and asked them to look into it.
Even the most expensive digital cameras have
to think for a second or so before taking a shot. Something that in
my mind, makes them dubious for portraits, action shot
etc.
Just my 3 pence worth.
James
|
- Pentax future: advanced and classy or cheap and shoddy? [w... Alexander Krohe
- Re: Pentax future: advanced and classy or cheap and s... Pål Jensen
- RE: Pentax future: advanced and classy or cheap and s... Glen O'Neal
- Re: Pentax future: advanced and classy or cheap and s... Brad Dobo
- Re: Pentax future: advanced and classy or cheap and s... William Robb
- Re: Pentax future: advanced and classy or cheap and s... Brad Dobo
- Re: Pentax future: advanced and classy or cheap and s... Rick Diaz