Thanks, Thibault, for posting those notes. I'll have to try that combo
shortly.

t

On 1/3/03 11:20 AM, Thibault GROUAS wrote:

>> Which is your favorite for large (8x10 & up) prints,
>> in 35mm format?
> 
> For large enlargements (10x12 and larger) I use Kodak Technical Pan which I
> rate at ISO 20. Here are my recipes with Rodinal :
> 
> - Rodinal 1+100 6' 20° for high contrast but still continuous tone
> (reproduction, abstracts).
> 
> - Rodinal 1+120 6' 20° for places - normal contrast.
> 
> - Rodinal 1+135 6' 20° for people - softer contrast.
> 
> Agitation for the first 10 seconds than 5 seconds every minute.
> 
> I use distilled water (plain water gives me black spots on the negs) and mix
> the developper with a 10ml and 1ml syringes (a must have with such high
> dilutions).
> 
> This gives nice razor sharp negs, far sharper than those I got with Pan F+ /
> Tmax 100. My dilutions and times provide negs that print best at grade 2.
> 
> The other really nice thing about tech pan is that negatives a far thinner
> and transparent than with other films. Enlarging exposures are about 2 to 4
> times shorter and this saves a lot of time with large prints at f/8.
> Exposures are about 5 to 10 minutes when usually it was 20 to 40 minutes
> with tri-X ! I can tell that my arms fell the difference...
> 
> The only problem with Tech pan is its price (about 10 EUR at local stores
> here). Not the kind of film you will want to use with the motor drive set at
> 5fps. Hopefully development with Rodinal is very cheap. And since I use to
> load/unload tech pan in complete darkness I use to develop only the part of
> the film I just exposed and put the remaining film back on the camera for
> later use.
> 
> I'am used to tri-X in Rodinal and can tell that if you like grain 8x10 and
> 10x12 still look nice enlarged. I only choose tech pan when I need absolute
> sharpness. I don't use much other films than those two.
> 
> Oh and since I'am back from my New Year's Eve trip I wish you all a very
> happy new year, and the best photographic opportunities you can get.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Thibault Grouas.
> 

Reply via email to