Thanks to all who replied.
I'm talking about Philips 109S-20 vs. 109B-20 models.
AFAICS on their site the two have the same bandwidth (234 MHz, pretty
good), same max. and reccommended res. (1920x1440 and 1280x1024), same
max. refresh rate @ reccommended res. (85 Hz.).
Both are shadow mask.
The better one has a slightly higher max. horizontal scan frequency (97
vs. 92 Hz.), is declared as "Real Flat" and has a slightly lower light
transmission rate (44% vs. 46%). That's all.
BTW I can't understand the last one. Shouldn't the better one have
higher light transmission ratio?
Thanks again.
Flavio
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
