Yeahbut, yeahbut...if it ain't a 85mm at the low end, none of this
pertains, Kind Sir!

Now, have you any wonderful info about the 85-205 M-42 f/3.8 Vivitar tank?

keith

Peter Alling wrote:
> 
> The one I was speaking of was a two touch f3.8 with a yellow Macro focusing
> dot on the focus ring and macro focus range on the zoom ring.  There's a
> click stop at the 75mm focal length which you would turn past to enter "macro
> focus", actually close focus to 1-4 at 75mm.
> 
> At 10:12 AM 1/18/2003 -0800, you wrote:
> >Hi Peter,
> >  Just to make sure, we are talking about the 85-205/3.8, not the
> >75-205/3.5 or 3.8?
> >Steve Larson
> >Redondo Beach, California
> >"Everyone has a photographic memory. Some just don't have film."
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Peter Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 9:11 AM
> >Subject: Re: Vivitar zoom question
> >
> >
> > > In a way it's a find.  It shared the same optical formula with the first
> > > legendary 70-210 f3.5 S1.  I don't think it was multi coated since it
> >seemed to
> > > suffer from an inordinate amount of flair.  If I remember correctly there
> > > was also a special matched multiplier available for that lens which was
> >nice
> > > to have in a pinch.  (It is a lot more compact than the Series 1 due to
> > > it's slightly slower max aperture and two touch design, but still
> >relatively
> > > ruggedly built).  I happen to have it's little brother a 70-150 same
> > > optical formula and I have the MM for that which gives you a lot of lens
> > > in a very small package, the 75-205 isn't a lot bigger as I recall.
> > >
> > > At 05:00 AM 1/18/2003 -0800, you wrote:
> > > >All this recent talk of Vivitars has elicited a couple of questions...
> > > >
> > > >Not long ago, I won a bid on eBay for a very nice but older Pentax
> > > >body and accessories.
> > > >Among the pile was this NEW M-42 Vivitar zoom, 85 to 205mm, f/3.8 to
> >22.0.
> > > >This was a sort of 'throw in' item, as I was really buying the body,
> > > >not all the lenses...
> > > >Apparently the seller was getting rid of all his M-42 gear, so he more
> > > >or less threw it in.
> > > >
> > > >In the meanwhile, I got to thinking about it.
> > > >On a long list of non-Pentax M-42 lenses I recently reviewed, it seems
> > > >that particular focal length has not been repeated by Vivitar nor any
> > > >of the others in the business.
> > > >And Vivitar has apparently only made one of that model. They make
> > > >other ranges of zooms that repeat focal lengths, but not in 85-205mm.
> > > >
> > > >Does anyone have any idea if anyone has tested this lens, or has other
> > > >data on it?
> > > >
> > > >I plan to do some of my own testing, of course, but in the
> > > >meanwhile...the focal length is sort of an oddball, and I wondered
> > > >about it.
> > > >
> > > >Thanks, all...
> > > >
> > > >keith whaley
> > >
> > > Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
> > >      Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.  --Groucho Marx
> > >
> 
> Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
>      Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.  --Groucho Marx

Reply via email to