Pål Jensen wrote: > > Keith wrote: > > > > But a test whose parameters are in constant flux... > > > > What does THAT mean? Oh, I know what a 'constant state of flux' means, > > but I don't know what YOU mean by the statement. > > I mean that when you are making a test that most people interpret as what is >"better" of camera "A" or "B", and the outcome of this test is dependent on other >subjects (which are not supposedly tested)...
Huh? >...whose quality are changing at six months intervals. I missed something. Where did "6 month intervals" come from? I saw two cameras hoisted upon two tripods, side by side, presumably for exposing all at essentially the same time. Not so? > If youre chaning the scanner or the printer (or even the film) in this test they >outcome will change. What then are you really testing? > > It is also weird that some rave about images (originals) with less than 50 lines per >mm as being great. This is the second "where did this come from?" Who/which has resolution like that? The lens on the Canon? Beter think on that one. I perceived the Canon as presenting shots with DEFINITELY better resolution than the Pentax. Not to say, better shodow detail. > Pål keith
