One of the better pro photographers in Detroit, Tom Roche, had a portfolio show at my place of work last week. I had visited his studio last year to watch him shoot 4x5 digital, with computer tiling, and at that time he had told me that most of his work was digital. After looking through his latest portfolio last week, I asked him if it was all digital. He replied that only a couple of the shots were digital. He's gone back to film for a lot of his work. He said that everyone is shooting digital now, and it's no longer a novelty. The art directors are clamoring for film. So he's back to shooting film: 4x5 in the studio, Pentax 6x7 on location. Paul Stenquist
- Re: What is better? Digital Full Frame against 67 Mike Johnston
- Re: What is better? Digital Full Frame against 67 Ryan K. Brooks
- Re: What is better? Digital Full Frame against 67 William Robb
- Re: What is better? Digital Full Frame against 67 Peter Alling
- Re: What is better? Digital Full Frame against 67 Peter Alling
- Re: What is better? Digital Full Frame against 67 T Rittenhouse
- Re: What is better? Digital Full Frame against 67 Herb Chong
- Re: What is better? Digital Full Frame against 67 Herb Chong
- Re: What is better? Digital Full Frame against 67 T Rittenhouse
- Re: What is better? Digital Full Frame against... Paul Stenquist
- Re: What is better? Digital Full Frame against 67 Mike Johnston
- Re: What is better? Digital Full Frame against 67 Mike Johnston
- RE: What is better? Digital Full Frame against 67 J. C. O'Connell
- Re: What is better? Digital Full Frame against... Arnold Stark
- Re: What is better? Digital Full Frame aga... Pål Jensen
- Re: What is better? Digital Full Frame aga... T Rittenhouse
- Re: What is better? Digital Full Frame... Bruce Rubenstein
- Re: What is better? Digital Full ... William Robb
- Re: What is better? Digital F... Bruce Rubenstein
- Hail the PDML! (Was: What is be... Lasse Karlsson