Thanks Alan,
I guess I'll strick to Pentax, then.
Regards,
Łukasz
===================================
www.fotopolis.pl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===================================
internetowy magazyn o fotografii
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 7:06 AM
Subject: Re: Sigma 24/2.8 Super Wide II
> >Anybody has this lens? How good/bad is it? I'm tempted by the 24 mm, but
> >I'm not sure about the quality. How is the manual focus? I'm thinking
> >about buying either this Sigma or a FA 28/2.8 AL. Is the Pentax lens
> >significantly better?
>
> I had these Sigma 24mm and 28mm few years back, both manual focus.
> Optically, both are great imho. However, both suffers from flare problem
and
> substandard mechanical design, particularly the aperture ring assembly.
The
> 24mm even had worse rubber, aperture ring material and electrical contacts
> (all 3 wore noticably faster than the even older 28/2.8). The satin finish
> was a joke and the 10 years old shiny surface is better. Both hoods were
> useless to guard again flare, although they were well made. I don't know
> much about the FA28/2.8AL. But if you can afford the extra, either go for
> the FA*24/2 (which I am very happy with) or A24/2.8.
>
> regards,
> Alan Chan
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>
--------------r-e-k-l-a-m-a-----------------
OnetPoczta: duża, szybka, bezpieczna!
http://poczta.onet.pl/oferta/
