Thank you! You are lucky man to have such a lens. It must be one if not the best in this focal range or any macro lens. Do you have any picture from it on website? Alek Użytkownik Vick, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał: >For a comparison of the elements see: >http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/lenses/primes/_optics/200f4-Macro-i.jpg >and >http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/lenses/primes/_optics/200f4-Macro-ii.gif > >The internal focus on the FA200 is invaluable for macro work. >Plus, the FA is RAZOR sharp at all apertures and even sharper in the f/8 to f/32 >range - sharper than the A200. The A200 is very good in the f/8 to f/22 range but >not as sharp as the FA200. >The FA200 has 9 Aperture Blades vs. the 8 on the A200. >This I think leads to a "softer" bokeh on the FA200. >Jason > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 10:53 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Overexposure of PZ1+ > > >Hi, >But is there any optical difference between A and FA for macro work?Sharpness, bokeh >etc?Also FA is better? >Alek >Użytkownik Vick, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał: >>I don\\\'t have any direct comparison with Cannon or Nikon, but have used both the >FA200 ED Macro and the A200 ED Macro. >>The FA200 (IF) is AWESOME - I can find no faults with it, razor sharp, excellent >bokeh, I like the Internal Focus and the focus limiter provides excellent and quick >focusing. >>The A200 is a very good lens but not quite as sharp as the FA200 at the extremes. >>Jason >> >> >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 9:52 AM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Overexposure of PZ1+ >> >> >>Hi, >>So FA 200 macro must be much better than C/N counterparts. >>Do you have both?What is the price of A version if appears. >>BTW Do you have FA35/2.0?any comments... >>Thank you >>Alek >>Użytkownik Pĺl Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał: >>>Alek wrote: >>> >>>> But with K and M lenses you could not use matrix... just central or spot >>> >>>and??????? >>> >>> >>>> Do you have Pentax FA 200/4 ED macro lens? Or A200/4 ED macro? >>>> If so which is better? >>> >>>If pressed I think the FA* is slightly better but significantly larger and heavier. >>> >>>>What about competition in this range-Nikon/Canon/Sigma?ANy comments... >>> >>> >>>According to the only test I\\\\\\\'ve seen on the 200 macro lenses the A* 200/4 >macro beats the Nikon and Canon counterparts. >>> >>>Pĺl >>> >> >> >>--------------r-e-k-l-a-m-a----------------- >> >>OnetPoczta: duża, szybka, bezpieczna! >>http://poczta.onet.pl/oferta/ >> >--------------r-e-k-l-a-m-a----------------- > > >Hotele - rezerwuj do 40% TANIEJ! >http://noclegi.onet.pl > --------------r-e-k-l-a-m-a-----------------
Tanie bilety lotnicze! http://samoloty.onet.pl
