But I bet the KX is more reliable. why? becuase its really just a slightly modified spottie which are extremely reliable.
Secondly TTL flash is overrated in my opinion, on camera flash pix suck even when they are perfectly exposed. Fill flash looks good, but even the LX maxes out at 1/90 for flash doesnt it? As for the LX metering/AE going to minutes, it's going to underexpose due to film reciprocal failure anyway. When doing those kinds of shots you need to bracket like hell MANUALLY. That's right, good ol' fashion "B" and a stop watch. JCO > -----Original Message----- > From: Anton Browne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 2:21 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Bodies: K2 vs. KX vs. LX > > > I think it has to be the LX, for the meter that can go to > minutes, the TTL flash - and later when your funds have recovered > - the waist level and angle finders. The mirror lock-up on the MX > seems to be a 'fortunate' bug but on mine it's unreliable. Tap > the shutter too hard and it fires, too lightly and nothing > happens, it has to be just so. There's also the question of > whether this practice damages the mechanism! > > Seems to me the LX has everything you need so no contest. In two > years time you'll have forgotten about the expense. > > Anton > > __________________________________________________________________________ > Freeserve AnyTime - Go online whenever you want for just £6.99 a month for > your first 3 months, that's HALF PRICE! And then it's just £13.99 a month > after that. > > For more information visit http://www.freeserve.com/time/ or call free on > 0800 970 8890 > >
