On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Mark Roberts wrote: > gfen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >It IS good looking. > <snip>
I'm a little bothered that you completley took that out of context, and the fact that its a direct response to Pal stating its not a good looking camera and derivitive trash. Truth be told, I don't care WHAT it looks like as long as it fits in my hand the way I want it to, and does what I want it to. > *Very* few people are going to base the purchase of a $1500.00 camera on > how it looks. Especially in the first year when it seems likely there > will be a waiting list to get the *ist-D. Hey, if I could afford it and justify it (at the same time, there's the rub!), I'd be on the list. -- http://www.infotainment.org <-> more fun than a poke in your eye. http://www.eighteenpercent.com <-> photography and portfolio.
