Nick Zentena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On June 5, 2003 07:53 pm, Bruce Rubenstein wrote: >> Of course you didn't. That's why you didn't understand that the >> Valentin's original post was a "spoof" test. Projecting images with a >> high resolution projector, then a low resolution projector and then >> claiming that the original image source was the cause in the difference >> is so absurd as to be funny. Only a fool or an idiot would think that >> this was a legitimate test. > > So it was stacked in favour of the digital. What's new?
It was stacked *against* digital. -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
