All my lenses are of the compatible variety except one. Yet when multiplying the focal lengths with the 1.5 factor I only get two usable lenses, so digital looks like a more expensive proposition than just body and accessories. Add to this the relatively low resolution and loss of aperture ring control, and obviously at this stage the *ist d is of little interest to me. If I were hard pressed to go digital, I'd see no compelling advantage in staying with Pentax. That's why I'll stick with slide film for a while and wait for the dust to settle. Afterwards I'll have a hard look and by then Pentax better be very convincing, that is with full frame and decent lens compatibility or, if not the latter, then it better offer IS/USM.
Servus, Alin Rob wrote: RS> OK the D *ist isn't in our hands so we can only speculate based on what's been RS> reported. So given what is known who of those of us that envisage moving into RS> digital are likely to purchase a D *ist and why? RS> Who of us think it's time to move to the dark side and why?
