Doug wrote:
Why the hell does it matter to you if Paal shoots to his satisfation? Does it affect your photography even a little bit?
REPLY: The modus operandi is the following: He doesn't use equipment where you can set exposure consistently within 1/3s.
Trying to change the subject, Paal ? I thought we were debating *your* claims of having a camera with a 100% accurate meter and getting 1/3 precision in 100% of the final shots. I say that the part about the meter is plainly impossible, and 1/3 stop is a precision that you should check with a densitometer to see if it's real.
I am sane enough as not to make any unbelievable claims about my camera without being able to substantiate them with hard evidence.
> When I say that I want such possibilities on my equipment I must want it for non-valid or suspect reason because the person in question doesn't use it.
Are you imagining things again ? Can you quote me saying that ? Why don't you keep to the facts ?
cheers, caveman
