If "quality" in a 35mm body is defined by a camera that
approaches the size and weight of a medium format
camera, the MZ-S would feel cheap indeed. If, however,
you equate quality in 35mm with a small, well-built
package that seems durable, the MZ-S wins hands down.
I think I should also point out that the camera I saw,
like all the MZ-S bodies in the states, are =not=
considered production models. They are "working" models,
which means that they were put together for PMA and for
initial looks by dealers (and some other interested
parties[ahem]).
Flash exposure compensation does not follow the PZ-1p
model, but rather the ZX/MZ model.
Doug
Quoting dick graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Doug, I gather that you felt that the camera had a
quality feel to it
> unlike my brother,the photo store dealer, who said
that it felt
> cheap. Also did you find anything out about flash
exposure compensation?
>
> DG
Ashwood Lake Photography
http://www.alphoto.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
