Doug wrote:


> If "quality" in a 35mm body is defined by a camera that 
> approaches the size and weight of a medium format 
> camera, the MZ-S would feel cheap indeed. If, however, 
> you equate quality in 35mm with a small, well-built 
> package that seems durable, the MZ-S wins hands down.


Theres a danger that the MZ-S isn't really understood as a product by everybody. The 
MZ-S fits in with lightweight, magnesium outdoor  gear. A small, tough and capable 
body is welcomed by many.

Pål

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to