Caveman wrote: Just marketing talk (that also inspired Paal with the "100% accurate metering" claim).
REPLY: It is based on experience as usual not marketing talk. Meters that are 100% for what they are calibrated for is something thats taken for granted these days. Your insistence on this issue really only tells that you're unable to nail exposure consistently and that tells something about your ablities as a photographer and nothing about the rest of us or metering accuracy. Pål
