Hi,

My buddy has one, I have used it a few times and informally compared it to
the K30/2.8 and Super Takumar 35/3.5.   It is a reasonably sharp lens,
though not outstanding, about on par with the FA28-70/4 at middle apertures.
It is ok wide open. It exhibits a warm color balance (in comparison to K30
and ST35) and good flare control.  Mechanically the lens feels solid though
the diaphragm is beginning to be sluggish, a problem with this particular
lens as I understand. The actual focal lenght is slightly longer than the
ST35 which is supposedly the same optically to the K35/3.5.  Bokeh, which is
subjective, is fine but not as good ( IMO) as either the K30 or Super Tak.
Overall, I think it is quite a decent though not superb lens that should
give you quite nice photos.  If you have any other questions, feel free to
ask.

Thanks,

William in Utah.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PDML" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 1:05 PM
Subject: Opinions needed about SMC M 35/2.8


> Hi!
>
> I am about to buy the above lens in Excellent condition from KEH.
> Well, as a matter of fact a friend of mine is about to buy this lens
> which then be brought over to Israel.
>
> Anyway, is there anyone on the list who actually has/had this lens and
> used it? If so, I would very much like to hear your opinion about it.
>
> From what I could dig out in different archives on the Net it appears
> that this is average (in Pentax manner) lens with resolution a little
> below that of 50/1.7. My intent is to attach this lens to ME Super and
> keep it there for some time. I also have soft, cross screen and
> circular polarizer filters all of which are going to find themselves
> attached to this lens in some way. Well, not all of them at the same
> time though <vbg>.
>
> Once bought I will have the modest prime outline - 35/2.8, FA 50/1.7,
> modified Helios single element soft lens (~85/4), and almost-the-lens
Takumar
> K 135/2.5. Though I like extremely the almost-the-lens.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> ---
> Boris Liberman
> www.geocities.com/dunno57
>
>

Reply via email to