Pål Jensen wrote: >John wrote: >>No doubt Paal will tell me I'm wrong again. > >REPLY: >Why should I say that? I've said the same >thing since I forst heard about the 4/3 system. >The Olympus makes more sense than the *ist D >(or D10 for that matter) to me. >The way I see it is that the Olympus offer >advantages beyond the fact that it doesn't >use film.
Good grief! We agree. Hugs, John ;-)
