[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > What is within the realm of possibility for what camera it might have been will > depend on the age of the sub and the procurement rules for your Navy. It would not > have been an MX on a US Navy sub.
Why not? >I suspect most camera bodies from the era that these would be from will look small mounted on a periscope. FWIW, Olympus was very big in microscopes and 35mm bodies for use on microscopes. Olympus is probably the most likely candidate. If a Japanese Pentax would not be found aboard a U.S. Navy sub, why would a Japanese Olympus be okay. Something not revealed here. keith whaley
