I'll go for the K 135/2.5 since the F and FA are probably more expensive. I may decide to get the Takumar as well as some of the pictures I have seen taken with it look very nice indeed. Then I'll choose.
Got the fisheye 17/4 for 230 euro's. Probably a bit too much, but I really wanted one. :-) Paul Delcour > From: "Alan Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 15:29:43 -0700 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Pentax A28-135/4 --- SMC 135/2.5 > Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:29:53 -0400 > >> Sorry to disapoint you, the K 135/2.5 you narrowed your search to is >> limited to 1.5 m (enough for portraits if you ask me, but tastes may >> vary). To get closer than that you'll have to look at FA 135/2.8. > > Or the F135/2.8, but I recommend the FA which has better mechanical design. > > Alan Chan > http://www.pbase.com/wlachan > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus >
