Damn, what was it? They weren't really marketed as a GM car (sort of like a Japanese Saturn, they had their own "division"). Not Geo. Damn, this is going to piss me off. If I think of it later, I'll Google GM/Isuzu, I'm sure something will come up.
I recall it was around the time that Isuzu sold something with a "suspension tuned by Lotus" badge on it - I think GM may have had shares of Lotus too? Or not, I don't know.
cheers, frank
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hummm....? The guys working at Hydromatic in Ypsilanti might argue about GM not building automatic transmissions with you, Paul.
However, I will note that unless the changed the laws over in Japan GM does not own Isuzu, the Japanese government does not (or at least did not) allow foreign control of Japanese Companies.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Uh, Bill, I hate to burst your bubble, but Isuzu isn't an American car, and it isn't a GM car. GM doesn't build transmissions. They buy them from suppliers, same as Isuzu. It might be the same trans that GM uses, but it's not their part.
_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
