Bill, What if you wanted to catch a sequence of a car going into the gravel trap, or a rider being ejected from his motorcycle? Can you shoot (on film) 5 frames in in one second (the time it takes for a spin to happen) winding with your thumb?
This fps argument has been going on for ages. High frame rates are extremely useful in certain situations and worthless in others. Obviously experience in how to shoot action is very important, but getting a sequence requires high fps. Christian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Actually, IMNHO, you'd be better off using single frame mode and experience. > > Bill > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Malcolm Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 4:13 AM > Subject: RE: my ist-D samples > > > > > Are you suggesting that if I was, for example, taking a number of shots in > > succession - horseracing, motor sports etc, I would be better off with a > > film camera and motordrive? > > > > Malcolm > > > > > > > >
