virtually all my printing is 11x14 and larger for my permanent portfolio. anything i care about for more than a year or two goes on Epson large format printers with archival digital inks and is considerably more expensive, but they get sold or given away as gifts. none of those can afford to be printed with nonarchival inks on cheap media. i'm seriously thinking of getting the Epson 4000 for my business. it is a better printer than the 2200 in terms of throughput and paper handling.
Herb.... ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 4:30 PM Subject: Re: Re[2]: An observation re Pentax for sale > It's close on an 8x10 - I think you can manage just a little cheaper > than that at home, even without going to refilled cartridges, etc. > Can't touch those 4x6 prices, though. > > But the original price comparison was to film. How much do you have > to pay for an 8x10 from a 35mm negative? How much for 6x4 reprints > (not doene at the time the film was processed)?
