Dave Miers wrote: > > I suppose the biggest thing you should take into > consideration is that > when > > people look at your picture, they're not looking at your > darn camera. > No-one > > will give a stuff about the camera that took the picture except the > > photographer. > > I assume you were not counting the people on this list > because if you were to post a really good image with out > including the equipment and settings used......that would be > most of these characters first question I'd bet...lol
I take what you say with the spirit it's intended, but I find with digital, most of the 'magic' has gone; all the poor shots simply won't be saved. I certainly wouldn't place anyone here in that category, but no one will explore why it's a poor shot. It will all be a case of 'that's good enough for...(add e-mail to relatives or look good enough for a website)'. Of course, it may be a good thing to get more people involved in photography, in that some have some real talent and enjoy it for the hobby it is, rather than a computer add on. The simply fact is that most new camera sales fall one of two ways; digital or single-use. I don't like that much but tough, I've got to learn to live with it. Malcolm
