I can say that I have not had the same experience with my Tamarack...sounds
like anecdotal evidence to me.... Maybe your photons spin in the opposite
direction down under...8-)....YMMV.
Jerry in Houston
-----Original Message-----
From: Leon Altoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 3:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Pacific Image PrimeFilm 1800u Scanner
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001 11:52:45 -0500, Provencher, Paul M. wrote:
>Any comments? I am thinking of returning it for something else - it's not
>doing what I need it to do (scan negs)
You will spend a lot more for a better scanner. I can say don't buy a
Tamrack. They may do 2400 dpi but that is the only way it is better
than the Primefilm. It looses shadow details and washes out highlights
dreadfully and once when looking at one in a shop when I was ready to
buy the display model ate the slide carrier and promptly got stuck for
an hour - with MY slides inside. I'd like a 4000 dpi Polaroid, but
can't afford it. I'm keeping my Primefilm until I can.
Leon
http://www.bluering.org.au
http://www.bluering.org.au/leon
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
