--
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
Ok, guys, maybe this is the inexperience coming out in me again, BUT, I don't "get" this photo. Technically, how is it possible? I mean if those shots truly showed the sun, then how did it manage to show it as a perfect little circle with no flare/rays etc? AND if it truly is 38 separate exposures, each taken at different times of the year, then there should be different shadows all over the shot everywhere, and clearly they are all leaning to the left as though the sun is to the right? I don't know, like I said, maybe I really don't know much at all about photography, but this shot just doesn't seem to be "right" to me? Also, if that truly was 38 separate exposures then wouldn't the highlights on the stone ruins etc be totally burnt out? BUT, then it says there was only one "foreground" exposure, so how is that possible?
confused, and possibly showing my "blonde" side, tan.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Pieter Nagel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 5:18 AM
Subject: Multiple exposure shot over course of the year
Here's something cool: a single frame of film shot with 38 multiple exposures during the course of the year:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap030320.html
It shows loopy-8 course the sun takes over the course of the year.
-- ,_ /_) /| / / i e t e r / |/ a g e l
-- graywolf http://graywolfphoto.com
"You might as well accept people as they are, you are not going to be able to change them anyway."
