Perhaps the "K challenged mount" would suffice.
Bruce Thursday, January 1, 2004, 10:48:56 AM, you wrote: ft> You're right, John, ft> We should call it a "differently-abled mount". Or maybe a "special mount". ft> I'm starting to feel better about it already... ft> <vbg> ft> -frank (on his lawyer's advice) ft> "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist ft> fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer >>From: "John Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: AP liked the *ist 35mm best >>Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 12:59:06 -0500 (EST) >> >> > >> > On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, Mark Roberts wrote: >> > >> > > Pity it's (like all film cameras) being overshadowed by things >>digital. >> > >> > Pity, also, that it's a cripple mount. >> >>It doesn't matter how many times you use that stupid description; >>Pentax aren't going to change how their cameras work. >> >>So why not just stop the childish name-calling? >> ft> _________________________________________________________________ ft> Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* ft> http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcomm&pgmarket=en-ca&RU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca
