On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 22:52, mike wilson wrote:
> Frits Wüthrich wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 20:08, mike wilson wrote:
> > > I think the "nature" of the restriction Paul is talking about is nudity,
> > > of Homo sapiens at least.
> > >
> > Yes, I understand that, but I didn't find anything in the submission guidelines
> > about such a restriction.
>
> It's an unwritten one that has been been (very subtly) broken at least
> once. If the basic presumption is that most "art" nudes are terminally
> naff and most "glamour" nudes are unbearably derogatory to women, I, for
> one, don't have a problem with the restriction. Especially as that type
> of photography is difficult to avoid in many other forums on the
> internet.
>
> mike
I have no problem with the restriction, but why don't we have that in the guidelines?
--
Frits Wüthrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
