What I meant was that these 3 lenses were too close or overlaping each other, and they have been released within a very short timeframe. Why bother the 18-35 when they were going to release the 16-45? Why a prime 14 when they already have a 16-45? Why not 14-?? in the first place? The only logical explanation is that the 14ED was so superior in optical performance they believed an extra prime 14 was justified. However, I have reservation on this theory and people really like super wide zooms these days.

Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan

What's wrong, did you hope for a 12mm, or a 12-24mm?

I think they're starting with the most mainsteam lenses. Many consider anything below 20mm (for FF) as specialist area, and not for the mass market.

I doubt if we will ever see DA lenses much above 20mm. Even Nikon 12-24 is said to be FF from 18mm and up.

DagT

_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcomm&pgmarket=en-ca&RU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca




Reply via email to