John Mustarde écrit: > On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:39:38 -0700, you wrote: > > >For most of my uses, the antiquated and > >much-maligned autofocus in the PZ-1p is superior to the *ist D. > > I agree with that. > > Two things the PZ1p excelled at: focusing on a bird in the bush > without hunting all over the place or getting stuck on the twig in > front of it, and low-light AF. > > The more I use the *istD, the more I think its AF is worse than the > PZ1p in every respect. But I haven't given them a fair comparison > yet, just seat of the pants impressions. > > -- > John Mustarde > www.photolin.com >
DO you compare the *ist D in a single centered Af mode or with all set on ? I remember something about the MZ S and the Z1p : The MZ S is faster and can "catch" a flying aircraft and follow it during all the show in Automatic mode. That is why I am very surprised about the lack of success with the *ist D in AF performances
